Alfredo Prieto v. Keith Davi
Petitioner - Appellant: ALFREDO PRIETO
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Case Number: 14-4
Filed: September 3, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 30, 2015 Summary Prieto v. Zook

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405523055 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00849-HEH. [999611947]. [14-4]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alfredo Prieto v. Keith Davi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ALFREDO PRIETO
Represented By: Miriam Bamberger Airington
Represented By: Mary Virginia Gayner Andraos
Represented By: Cary Breckinridge Bowen
Represented By: Michele Jill Brace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Represented By: Alice Theresa Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?