Ronnie Penley v. Cynthia Thornton
RONNIE NEIL PENLEY |
CYNTHIA THORNTON, Administrator, Harnett Correctional Institution |
14-6311 |
February 28, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Ronnie Penley v. Cynthia Thornton |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404992200 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999312258-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00012-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999364621]. Mailed to: Ronnie Penley. [14-6311] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ronnie Penley v. Cynthia Thornton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: RONNIE NEIL PENLEY | |
Represented By: | Ronnie Neil Penley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: CYNTHIA THORNTON, Administrator, Harnett Correctional Institution | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.