David Muhammad v. Warden Bobby Shearin
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID WILLIAM STIGGER, a/k/a David Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN
Case Number: 14-7095
Filed: July 24, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 4, 2014 David Muhammad v. Warden Bobby Shearin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 405253501 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01072-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999486899]. Mailed to: David Muhammad. [14-7095]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Muhammad v. Warden Bobby Shearin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID WILLIAM STIGGER, a/k/a David Muhammad
Represented By: David William Stigger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN
Represented By: Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?