Bobby Gibson, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge
Petitioner - Appellant: BOBBY GIBSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: LARRY CARTLEDGE
Case Number: 14-7308
Filed: September 4, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 20, 2015 Bobby Gibson, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405309549 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:13-cv-02234-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999512957].. [14-7308]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bobby Gibson, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: BOBBY GIBSON, JR.
Represented By: Bobby Gibson
Represented By: John Brandt Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LARRY CARTLEDGE
Represented By: James Anthony Mabry
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?