Kenda R. Kirby v. North Carolina State
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENDA R. KIRBY
Defendant - Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 15-1333
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 2, 2015 Kenda Kirby v. North Carolina State University

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405610800 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to allow a new issue on appeal [999624699-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00850-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999652677]. Mailed to: Kirby. [15-1333]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kenda R. Kirby v. North Carolina State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KENDA R. KIRBY
Represented By: Kenda R. Kirby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: Alexander McClure Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?