Hephzibah Bates v. Federal Reserve Bank
HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates |
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND |
15-1610 |
June 8, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Hephzibah Bates v. Federal Reserve Bank |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405606171 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999606917-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00320-REP Copies to all parties and the district court. [999650592]. Mailed to: Hephzibah Bates. [15-1610, 15-1611, 15-1612, 15-1613, 15-1614, 15-1615, 15-1616] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Hephzibah Bates v. Federal Reserve Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates | |
Represented By: | Hephzibah Bates |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.