In re: Travis Denorris Arnold
Petitioner: In re: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
:
Case Number: 15-1869
Filed: August 5, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 21, 2015 In Re: Travis Arnold

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405758785 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999634731-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00322-TDS-1,1:15-cv-00498-WO-JEP,1:15-cv-00499-WO-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722162]. Mailed to: Travis Arnold. [15-1869]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Travis Denorris Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Represented By: Travis Denorris Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Angela Hewlett Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?