William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee: TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA, TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and in official capacity as a detective of the Cary North Carolina Police Department, GREGORY SAVAGE, individually and in official capacity as a police officer of the Cary North Carolina Police Department, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Cary North Carolina Police Department and PAT BAZEMORE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Cary North Carolina Police Department, successor to Chief Scott Cunningham
Case Number: 15-2024
Filed: September 4, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Represented By: William Scott Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and in official capacity as a detective of the Cary North Carolina Police Department
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GREGORY SAVAGE, individually and in official capacity as a police officer of the Cary North Carolina Police Department
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Cary North Carolina Police Department
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PAT BAZEMORE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Cary North Carolina Police Department, successor to Chief Scott Cunningham
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?