Dreamstreet Investments, Inc. v. MidCountry Bank
DREAMSTREET INVESTMENTS, INC., d/b/a DS Builders, a North Carolina Corporation |
MIDCOUNTRY BANK, a Federal Savings Bank |
15-2104 |
September 21, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Dreamstreet Investments, Inc. v. MidCountry Bank |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406301663 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00521-CCE-JEP. [999977919]. [15-2104] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dreamstreet Investments, Inc. v. MidCountry Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: DREAMSTREET INVESTMENTS, INC., d/b/a DS Builders, a North Carolina Corporation | |
Represented By: | Matthew I. Van Horn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: MIDCOUNTRY BANK, a Federal Savings Bank | |
Represented By: | Kevin William Butterfield |
Represented By: | Robert E. Levin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.