Brilliant Semenova v. MD Transit Administration
| BRILLIANT SEMENOVA |
| MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION |
| 15-2125 |
| September 23, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Brilliant Semenova v. MD Transit Administration
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406350384
PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03413-JFM. [1000000775]. [15-2125]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brilliant Semenova v. MD Transit Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BRILLIANT SEMENOVA | |
| Represented By: | James Steven Maxwell |
| Represented By: | Joel Robert Zuckerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Julie Theresa Sweeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
