Thomas Lovegrove v. Ocwen Home Loans Servicing
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS W. LOVEGROVE
Defendant - Appellee: OCWEN HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.L.C.
Case Number: 15-2158
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statuatory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 20, 2016 Thomas Lovegrove v. Ocwen Home Loans Servicing

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406328671 UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00329-MFU-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990739].. [15-2158]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Lovegrove v. Ocwen Home Loans Servicing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: THOMAS W. LOVEGROVE
Represented By: Gary M. Bowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: OCWEN HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.L.C.
Represented By: Alexander D. Bono
Represented By: Christopher Michele Corchiarino
Represented By: Brett Lawrence Messinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?