Jimmie Echols v. Branch Banking and Trust
| JIMMIE ECHOLS |
| BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST |
| 15-2322 |
| October 28, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jimmie Echols v. Branch Banking and Trust |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405847507
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00040-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764014]. Mailed to: Jimmie Echols 12330 8th Street Court Afton, MN 55001. [15-2322]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jimmie Echols v. Branch Banking and Trust | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JIMMIE ECHOLS | |
| Represented By: | Jimmie Echols |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Gerald Cahill |
| Represented By: | Kristen Price Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
