Jabbar Straws v. Robert Stevenson, III
| JABBAR JOMO STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws |
| ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden |
| 15-6502 |
| April 8, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jabbar Straws v. Robert Stevenson, III |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405618168
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-03484-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999656353]. Mailed to: Jabbar Straws. [15-6502]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jabbar Straws v. Robert Stevenson, III | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: JABBAR JOMO STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws | |
| Represented By: | Jabbar Jomo Straws |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
