Nathaniel Goode v. David Mitchell
NATHANIEL GOODE |
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent Lanesboro Correctional |
15-6631 |
April 28, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Nathaniel Goode v. David Mitchell |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405556133 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999573799-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999604906-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00022-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627197]. Mailed to: Nathaniel Goode LANESBORO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 280 Polkton, NC 28135-0000. [15-6631] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Nathaniel Goode v. David Mitchell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: NATHANIEL GOODE | |
Represented By: | Nathaniel Goode |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent Lanesboro Correctional | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.