US v. Dale Morehouse
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: DALE MOREHOUSE
Case Number: 15-6771
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 9, 2016 US v. Dale Morehouse

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406025490 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02180-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999848343].. [15-6771]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Dale Morehouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: G. Norman Acker
Represented By: Michael Bredenberg
Represented By: Robert J. Dodson
Represented By: Matthew Fesak
Represented By: Rudolf A. Renfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: DALE MOREHOUSE
Represented By: Cindy Johnette Bembry
Represented By: Joseph Lanny Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?