Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
| PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR. |
| HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Contractor with VDOC to operate and manage LVCC employees and staff to provide medical care to plaintiff, E. WRIGHT, Warden at LVCC, SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (female), SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (male), FANT, Unit Manager of Building #50 and the Therapeutic Community Program of Addictions Treatment, DAVIS, Unit Manager for Building #70, GRAVES, Unit Manager of Segregation, BOONE, Supervisor of Segregation, GOODE, Health Services Administrator of the LVCC Medical Department, KELLY, Law Library at LVCC, NURSE LUCY, Nurse and UNKNOWN MEDICAL STAFF TO BE NAMED LATER |
| 15-6817 |
| May 28, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405857679
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999677717-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999651127-2]; denying Motion to schedule oral argument [999636561-2]; denying Motion to expedite decision [999636561-3]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999613046-2]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999613046-3] Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999768815]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-6817]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
