US v. Isaac Armstead, IV
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ISAAC BENTON ARMSTEAD, IV, a/k/a Ike, a/k/a Issac Benton Armstead |
| 15-7658 |
| October 20, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405820854
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed under CJA [999701598-2] Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00258-MBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999751678]. Mailed to: Isaac Armstead, IV. [15-7658]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Isaac Armstead, IV | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Stanley D. Ragsdale |
| Represented By: | John David Rowell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: ISAAC BENTON ARMSTEAD, IV, a/k/a Ike, a/k/a Issac Benton Armstead | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Benton Armstead |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
