Lionell Ephraim v. Karen Hogsten
Petitioner - Appellant: LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden
Case Number: 15-7789
Filed: November 10, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 28, 2016 Lionell Ephraim v. Karen Hogsten

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 405937645 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-04701. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999806685]. [15-7789]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lionell Ephraim v. Karen Hogsten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams
Represented By: Lionell Elijah Ephraim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden
Represented By: John Fulton Gianola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?