Levi Springer v. Harold Clarke
Petitioner - Appellant: LEVI SPRINGER
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, D.O.C Director
Case Number: 15-7796
Filed: November 12, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 28, 2016 Levi Springer v. Harold Clarke

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406076056 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed -denying Certificate of appealability and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999771043-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01275-LO-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999871246]. Mailed to: Levi Springer. [15-7796]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Levi Springer v. Harold Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: LEVI SPRINGER
Represented By: Levi Springer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, D.O.C Director
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?