Dennis Graves v. Commonwealth of VA Dept Corr
DENNIS RAY GRAVES |
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
15-7891 |
November 30, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Dennis Graves v. Commonwealth of VA DepÂt of Corrections |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406174443 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999718799-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01276-JCC-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999918712].. [15-7891] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dennis Graves v. Commonwealth of VA Dept Corr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: DENNIS RAY GRAVES | |
Represented By: | Dennis Ray Graves |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.