Hugh Tito v. Ashton Carter
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUGH TITO
Defendant - Appellee: CHUCK HAGEL, The Honorable, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency)
Case Number: 16-1036
Filed: January 12, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 16, 2016 Hugh Tito v. Ashton Carter

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406157709 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00453-REP Copies to all parties and the district court. [999910960]. Mailed to: Hugh Tito. [16-1036]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hugh Tito v. Ashton Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: HUGH TITO
Represented By: Hugh Tito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CHUCK HAGEL, The Honorable, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency)
Represented By: Jonathan Holland Hambrick
Represented By: Margaret Harker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?