Andrew Kane v. Brian Lewi
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANDREW KANE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Dwayne Cornish
Defendant - Appellant: BRIAN LEWIS, OFFICER JOHN LEWIS, OFFICER JENSEN SHORTER, OFFICER LEAF A. LOWE, KENNETH MALIK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the Cambridge Police Dept. and THE COMMISSIONERS OF CAMBRIDGE, A Body Corporate and Politic
Case Number: 16-1140
Filed: February 10, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 13, 2017 Andrew Kane v. Brian Lewis

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406355624 UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-01157-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000003282]. [16-1140, 16-1239]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Andrew Kane v. Brian Lewi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ANDREW KANE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Dwayne Cornish
Represented By: Terrell Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BRIAN LEWIS
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: OFFICER JOHN LEWIS
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: OFFICER JENSEN SHORTER
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: OFFICER LEAF A. LOWE
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: KENNETH MALIK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the Cambridge Police Dept.
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: THE COMMISSIONERS OF CAMBRIDGE, A Body Corporate and Politic
Represented By: Daniel Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?