Reginald Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| REGINALD JONES |
| WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., d/b/a America's Servicing Company |
| 16-1308 |
| March 23, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Truth in Lending |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Reginald Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406237548
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00233-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948089].. [16-1308]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reginald Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: REGINALD JONES | |
| Represented By: | Jon D. Pels |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., d/b/a America's Servicing Company | |
| Represented By: | Justin E. Fine |
| Represented By: | Russell J. Pope |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
