Linda Carr v. Hutchens, Senter, Kellam
Plaintiff - Appellant: |
LINDA N. CARR |
Defendant - Appellee: |
HUTCHENS, SENTER, KELLAM, & PETTIT, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., d/b/a BANA, W. R. STARKEY, COUNTRY-WIDE BANK, FSB, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC and W. R. STARKEY MORTGAGE, LLP |
Case Number: |
16-1414 |
Filed: |
April 13, 2016 |
Court: |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 25, 2016 |
Filing
406124896
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999795152-2], [999815005-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999832296-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00532-RJC-DSC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999895632]. Mailed to: Linda N. Carr, Alexander Carter Covington. [16-1414]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Linda Carr v. Hutchens, Senter, Kellam |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Plaintiff - appellant: LINDA N. CARR |
Represented By: |
Linda N. Carr |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: HUTCHENS, SENTER, KELLAM, & PETTIT |
Represented By: |
Jeffrey Allen Bunda |
Represented By: |
Lacey M. Moore |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., d/b/a BANA |
Represented By: |
Alexander Carter Covington |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: W. R. STARKEY |
Represented By: |
|
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: COUNTRY-WIDE BANK, FSB |
Represented By: |
|
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC |
Represented By: |
Alexander Carter Covington |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Defendant - appellee: W. R. STARKEY MORTGAGE, LLP |
Represented By: |
Erik Michael Rosenwood |
Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?