Darrell Harris v. Police Nathan Ulmer
| BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, 6 UNKNOWN POLICE & K9 DOG, in both their official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department, MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, in both their official and individual capacities, GOVERNOR AND STATE OF MARYLAND and GOVERNOR MARTIN O'MALLEY, in both his official and individual capacity as Governor |
| DARRELL P. HARRIS |
| POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department and SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department |
| 16-1592 |
| May 25, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Darrell Harris v. Police Nathan Ulmer |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406199535
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion for stay pending appeal [999860051-2]; denying Motion to strike [999869219-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02470-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999930678]. Mailed to: Darrell P. Harris. [16-1592]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Darrell Harris v. Police Nathan Ulmer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DARRELL P. HARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Darrell P. Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Dugan McKevitt |
| Represented By: | Merrilyn E. Ratliff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Dugan McKevitt |
| Represented By: | Merrilyn E. Ratliff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 6 UNKNOWN POLICE & K9 DOG, in both their official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, in both their official and individual capacities | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GOVERNOR AND STATE OF MARYLAND | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GOVERNOR MARTIN O'MALLEY, in both his official and individual capacity as Governor | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
