Everett Flesher v. Carolyn Colvin
| EVERETT CURTIS FLESHER |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 16-1645 |
| June 7, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Everett Flesher v. Nancy Berryhill |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406689289
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-30661 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000157706].. [16-1645]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Everett Flesher v. Carolyn Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: EVERETT CURTIS FLESHER | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Kuhar Dyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Michael Horn |
| Represented By: | Eric P. Kressman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
