Milo Shammas v. Michelle Lee
| MILO SHAMMAS |
| MICHELLE KWOK LEE, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
| 16-1656 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406462754
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01462-TSE-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000053088]. [16-1656]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Milo Shammas v. Michelle Lee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MILO SHAMMAS | |
| Represented By: | John Nolan Jennison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MICHELLE KWOK LEE, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Carl Barghaan |
| Represented By: | R. Joseph Sher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
