Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, I
STARSHA SEWELL |
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED |
16-1739 |
July 5, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406225695 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00906-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999942776]. Mailed to: Starsha Sewell P. O. Box 7073 Capitol Heights, MD 20791. [16-1739] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, I | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: STARSHA SEWELL | |
Represented By: | Starsha Sewell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED | |
Represented By: | Michael William Tompkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.