B.G. v. Sam Malhotra
| B.G., By Her Next Friend B.G. |
| SAM MALHOTRA, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Human Resources, PETER BUESGENS, In His Official Capacity as Director of the Worcester County Department of Social Services, TERESA WALLER, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services, SHAE NOTTINGHAM, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services and KIMBERLY LINTON, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services |
| 16-1837 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406415385
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02663-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030985].. [16-1837]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: B.G. v. Sam Malhotra | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: B.G., By Her Next Friend B.G. | |
| Represented By: | Robert M. McCaig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SAM MALHOTRA, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Human Resources | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: PETER BUESGENS, In His Official Capacity as Director of the Worcester County Department of Social Services | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: TERESA WALLER, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SHAE NOTTINGHAM, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: KIMBERLY LINTON, In Her Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
