In re: John Bartley
Petitioner: In re: JOHN GLENN BARTLEY
:
Case Number: 16-1838
Filed: July 22, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 17, 2016 In Re: John Bartley

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406237904 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999907254-2]; denying Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 [999898112-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cr-00018-IMK-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948231]. Mailed to: John Glenn Bartley. [16-1838]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: John Bartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: JOHN GLENN BARTLEY
Represented By: John Glenn Bartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Michael D. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?