BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: ROUND HILL MUSIC LP
Defendant: COX ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, COXCOM, INC., d/b/a Cox Communications of Northern Virginia and JOHN DOE, IP Subscriber 174.65.175.31
Plaintiff - Appellee: BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC
Defendant - Appellant: COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Party-in-Interest: RIGHTSCORP, INC.
Case Number: 16-1972
Filed: August 24, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 1, 2018 Summary BMG Rights Management v. Cox Communications

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC
Represented By: Jeremy David Engle
Represented By: Paul Gennari
Represented By: Walter Dekalb Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROUND HILL MUSIC LP
Represented By: Jeremy David Engle
Represented By: Paul Gennari
Represented By: Walter Dekalb Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Craig Crandall Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: COXCOM, LLC
Represented By: Craig Crandall Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COX ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Craig Crandall Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COXCOM, INC., d/b/a Cox Communications of Northern Virginia
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE, IP Subscriber 174.65.175.31
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Party-in-interest: RIGHTSCORP, INC.
Represented By: Paul Gennari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?