Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Mary
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON
Defendant - Appellee: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.
Case Number: 16-1981
Filed: August 26, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 2, 2017 Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s Restaurants of MD

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406382629 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03196-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015835].. [16-1981]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Mary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON
Represented By: Rungrudee Suteerachanon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.
Represented By: Nigel F. Telman
Represented By: Alex Chad Weinstein
Represented By: Amanda C. Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?