Cheri Langehennig v. Michael L. Chapman
| CHERI LANGEHENNIG |
| MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, Loudoun County Sheriff's Office |
| 16-2032 |
| September 8, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Cheri Langehennig v. Michael Chapman |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406538913
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00466-AJT-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000088192].. [16-2032]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cheri Langehennig v. Michael L. Chapman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CHERI LANGEHENNIG | |
| Represented By: | Harvey Joseph Volzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, Loudoun County Sheriff's Office | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Francuzenko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
