Gerald Whiting v. Harold W. Clark
Petitioner - Appellant: GERALD WHITING
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARK, Director of VA Department of Corrections
Case Number: 16-6003
Filed: January 4, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 22, 2016 Gerald Whiting v. Harold Clark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 405880036 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00621-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999779271]. Mailed to: Whiting. [16-6003]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gerald Whiting v. Harold W. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: GERALD WHITING
Represented By: Gerald Whiting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARK, Director of VA Department of Corrections
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?