Marcus Antwon Greene v. Willie Eagleton
MARCUS ANTWON GREENE |
WILLIE L. EAGLETON, as the Warden of Evans Correctional Institution |
16-6212 |
February 12, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406060968 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to compel [999853461-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-02043-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999864739]. Mailed to: Marcus Antwon Greene EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 610 Highway 9 West Bennettsville, SC 29512-5202. [16-6212] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Marcus Antwon Greene v. Willie Eagleton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: MARCUS ANTWON GREENE | |
Represented By: | Marcus Antwon Greene |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WILLIE L. EAGLETON, as the Warden of Evans Correctional Institution | |
Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.