James Gregory Armistead v. Brad Perritt
JAMES G. ARMISTEAD |
BRAD PERRITT |
16-6390 |
March 16, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406182074 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999781145-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999787124-2]; granting Motion for leave to file [999804707-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02019-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999922310]. Mailed to: James G. Armistead SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 22385 McGirt's Bridge Road Laurinburg, NC 28353. [16-6390] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Gregory Armistead v. Brad Perritt | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: JAMES G. ARMISTEAD | |
Represented By: | James G. Armistead |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: BRAD PERRITT | |
Represented By: | Clarence Joe DelForge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.