William Jones v. Warden Kuma DeBoo
WILLIAM JONES, a/k/a William Seymour Jones |
WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO |
16-6565 |
April 19, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
William Jones v. Warden Kuma DeBoo |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406263510 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999823733-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999808683-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00120-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999960333]. Mailed to: William Jones. [16-6565] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Jones v. Warden Kuma DeBoo | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: WILLIAM JONES, a/k/a William Seymour Jones | |
Represented By: | William Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO | |
Represented By: | Helen Campbell Altmeyer |
Represented By: | Erin Carter Tison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.