Mark Kersey v. Keith Davi
MARK KERSEY |
KEITH DAVIS |
16-6751 |
June 3, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406321744 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999842091-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999873697-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999873680-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00133-TSE-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999987585]. Mailed to: Mark Kersey SUSSEX I STATE PRISON 24414 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-1111. [16-6751] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Mark Kersey v. Keith Davi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: MARK KERSEY | |
Represented By: | Mark Kersey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: KEITH DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Rosemary Virginia Bourne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.