Jackie Boyd v. Leroy Cartledge
Petitioner - Appellant: JACKIE LEE BOYD
Respondent - Appellee: LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden
Case Number: 16-6779
Filed: June 9, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 15, 2016 Jackie Boyd v. Leroy Cartledge

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406197860 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying motion to remand case [999885055-2] Originating case number: 6:14-cv-04342-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929907]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6779]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jackie Boyd v. Leroy Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JACKIE LEE BOYD
Represented By: Jackie Lee Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden
Represented By: James Anthony Mabry
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?