Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi |
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison |
16-6852 |
July 7, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406265687 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999891573-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999891571-2] Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00214-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999961474]. Mailed to: Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000. [16-6852] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi | |
Represented By: | Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison | |
Represented By: | Leah A. Darron |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.