Yesenia Ramirez v. Angela Rawski
Petitioner - Appellant: YESENIA CORTEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN ANGELA RAWSKI
Case Number: 16-7147
Filed: August 25, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 20, 2016 Yesenia Ramirez v. Angela Rawski

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406328455 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:15-cv-04631-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990633]. Mailed to: Yesenia Ramirez. [16-7147]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yesenia Ramirez v. Angela Rawski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: YESENIA CORTEZ RAMIREZ
Represented By: Yesenia Cortez Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN ANGELA RAWSKI
Represented By: Caroline M. Scrantom
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?