Deon Cobb v. Keen Mountain Correctional Ctr
DEON COBB |
KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, VA DOC |
16-7176 |
September 1, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Deon Cobb v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406465498 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999937207-2]; denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999921748-2]. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00214-REP-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000054265]. Mailed to: Deon Cobb. [16-7176] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Deon Cobb v. Keen Mountain Correctional Ctr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: DEON COBB | |
Represented By: | Deon Cobb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, VA DOC | |
Represented By: | Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.