Michael Contrez Jones v. Frank L. Perry
MICHAEL CONTREZ JONES |
FRANK L. PERRY |
16-7189 |
September 6, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406536893 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999936654-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999941371-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999943006-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02034-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087217]. Mailed to: Michael Contrez Jones ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 633 Old Landfill Road Taylorsville, NC 28681-0000. [16-7189] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Contrez Jones v. Frank L. Perry | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: MICHAEL CONTREZ JONES | |
Represented By: | Michael Contrez Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: FRANK L. PERRY | |
Represented By: | Peter Andrew Regulski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.