Tehgrain Jamal Jones v. Director
Petitioner - Appellant: TEHGRAIN JONES
Respondent - Appellee: DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 16-7217
Filed: September 12, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2017 Tehgrain Jones v. Director

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406392715 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00265-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000020651]. Mailed to: Jones. [16-7217]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tehgrain Jamal Jones v. Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: TEHGRAIN JONES
Represented By: Tehgrain Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Donald Eldridge Jeffrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?