Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAS. STEFEN EMIRA HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN EAGLETON, ASSO WARDEN BRADSHAW, CHAPLAIN WILKS, CAPT KELLY, DIRECTOR BYARS, being sued in their individual and official capacities as an employee in the scope of official duties and Public Duty Rule and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, being sued as an agency
Case Number: 16-7287
Filed: September 23, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 27, 2017 Ras. Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406454688 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:15-cv-04173-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000049270]. Mailed to: Stefen Emira Harris KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 4848 Goldmine Highway Kershaw, SC 29067-0000. [16-7287]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stefen Harris v. Warden Eagleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RAS. STEFEN EMIRA HARRIS
Represented By: Stefen Emira Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN EAGLETON
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ASSO WARDEN BRADSHAW
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CHAPLAIN WILKS
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAPT KELLY
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DIRECTOR BYARS, being sued in their individual and official capacities as an employee in the scope of official duties and Public Duty Rule
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, being sued as an agency
Represented By: Andrew Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?