James R. Dator v. Warden Joseph McFadden

Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES R. DATOR
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Lieber Corr Inst
Case Number: 16-7404
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
March 17, 2017 James Dator v. Warden Joseph McFadden
July 6, 2017 James Dator v. Warden Joseph McFadden

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2017 406592571 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01698-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000112823]. Mailed to: James Dator. [16-7404]
March 17, 2017 406443564 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01698-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Dator. [1000044135] [16-7404]
Search for this case: James R. Dator v. Warden Joseph McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JAMES R. DATOR
Represented By: James R. Dator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Lieber Corr Inst
Represented By: James Anthony Mabry
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?