Charles Anthony Ball v. Mike Slagle
| CHARLES ANTHONY BALL |
| MIKE SLAGLE, Correctional Administrator |
| 16-7422 |
| October 17, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406364406
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999950820-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999957448-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00045-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000007283]. Mailed to: Charles Anthony Ball MOUNTAIN VIEW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 545 Amity Park Road Spruce Pine, NC 28777-0000. [16-7422]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles Anthony Ball v. Mike Slagle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: CHARLES ANTHONY BALL | |
| Represented By: | Charles Anthony Ball |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: MIKE SLAGLE, Correctional Administrator | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
