Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynold
Petitioner - Appellant: DEXTER PALMER
Respondent - Appellee: CECELIA REYNOLDS, Warden at Lee Correctional Institution
Case Number: 16-7471
Filed: October 25, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 5, 2017 Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynolds

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406552153 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02571-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000094023]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7471]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DEXTER PALMER
Represented By: Dexter Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: CECELIA REYNOLDS, Warden at Lee Correctional Institution
Represented By: Alphonso Simon
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?