Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynold
| DEXTER PALMER |
| CECELIA REYNOLDS, Warden at Lee Correctional Institution |
| 16-7471 |
| October 25, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynolds |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406552153
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02571-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000094023]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7471]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dexter Palmer v. Cecelia Reynold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: DEXTER PALMER | |
| Represented By: | Dexter Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: CECELIA REYNOLDS, Warden at Lee Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | Alphonso Simon |
| Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
