Keith Bradley v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH RENARD BRADLEY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE
Case Number: 16-7504
Filed: November 1, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 4, 2017 Keith Bradley v. Warden Leroy Cartledge

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406467777 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. A certificate of appealability is denied. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-02705-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000055298]. Mailed to: Keith Renard Bradley. [16-7504]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Keith Bradley v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: KEITH RENARD BRADLEY
Represented By: Keith Renard Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE
Represented By: Caroline M. Scrantom
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?