Charles A. Williams v. Suzanne Matthew
| CHARLES A. WILLIAMS |
| SUZANNE MATTHEWS |
| 16-7533 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Charles Williams v. Suzanne Matthews |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406408894
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999970056-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02215-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027921]. Mailed to: Charles A. Williams SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 22385 McGirt's Bridge Road Laurinburg, NC 28353. [16-7533]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles A. Williams v. Suzanne Matthew | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: CHARLES A. WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Charles A. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: SUZANNE MATTHEWS | |
| Represented By: | Clarence Joe DelForge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
